Research Evaluation | Page 5
The Academic Advantage: Gender disparities in patenting
This content is not available in the selected language. Read more
Les études interdisciplinaires ont une plus grande portée scientifique
This content is not available in the selected language. Read more
Team Size Matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900.
This content is not available in the selected language. Read more
Are Quebec female health and NSE scientists really lagging behind? The relative impact of research funding and scientific production on scientific impact
This content is not available in the selected language. Read more
Pratiques alternatives de l’évaluation par les pairs
This content is not available in the selected language. Read more
Les répercussions du financement de la recherche et de la production scientifique sur l’impact scientifique dans les domaines de la santé, des sciences de la nature et du génie : les femmes universitaires québécoises sont-elles vraiment à la traîne?
This content is not available in the selected language. Read more
Researchers’ publication patterns and their use for author disambiguation
This content is not available in the selected language. Read more
The Use of Bibliometrics for Assessing Research: Possibilities, Limitations and Adverse Effects
This content is not available in the selected language. Researchers are used to being evaluated: publications, hiring, tenure and funding decisions are all based on the evaluation of research. Traditionally, this evaluation relied on judgement of peers but, in the light of limited resources and increased bureaucratization of science, peer review is getting more and […] Read more
Les facteurs de réussite d’un doctorat
This content is not available in the selected language. Read more
The consequences of retractions for co-authors: scientific fraud and error in biomedicine
This content is not available in the selected language. Read more